Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories

Welcome, Guest

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

Vanilla 1.1.2 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

    •  
      CommentAuthoridoru345
    • CommentTimeOct 10th 2006
     permalink

    "The very basis of the precautionary principle is to imagine the worst without supporting evidence...those with the darkest imaginations become the most influential.”


    Adam Curtis, “The Power of Nightmares” Part 3


    On line conversations can spin around, going nowhere, at an incredible speed (and with a peculiar sort of ferocity). They can also lead you to strange, quiet places.


    Last week – on line – I was discussing the possible meanings of a very old Egyptian statue: a representation of Khafra and Horus. Horus – depicted as a stylized falcon – cradles the back of the Pharaoh's head with his outstretched wings, perhaps whispering celestial mysteries into his ear.


    chephren-and-horus.jpg


    No doubt, egyptologists can offer a more scholarly, evidence supported interpretation.


    Beyond the precise political and religious uses to which the statue was put during Khafra's reign, and after, we were (we are) fascinated by the waking dream-state the statue presents.


    That is, the after-life and eternity fixated Egyptians carried with them, it seems, a dream of life's purpose that linked the mundane to the supra-mundane. This dream inspired them, during that ancient civilization's most fertile period, to embark on a sort of stone-based space program, an effort to build eternal structures and create a universe of imagery that kept the dream-state alive in people's minds everyday.


    I can't know with certainty, but I believe the old civilization, the culture that built immense monuments to cosmic concerns, faded as a dream-world first and then, due to various social/political pressures and time's irresistible damage, crumbled into what came next.


    ...


    Needless to say, America, during the (both on the ground and mind-formed) empire building decades that followed World War Two's end, cannot be compared, at least not flawlessly, to ancient Egypt; still, it (the U.S.) nurtured its own dream-state, one so seductive the world seemed compelled to fall deeply in love with it even as the real U.S. - or at least its strategists in Washington, committed all the old crimes using all the old excuses.


    america-iconography-composite2.jpg


    The dream was of a technologically advanced, politically fair-minded, future-oriented civilization, the burning chrome heart of shining modernity, the creator of actual stairways to heaven.


    ...


    In recent years, gathering greater and greater speed with each moment, this dream, this promise actually, has been dying. It's being replaced, as Adam Curtis states, with a nightmare of endlessly increased security, eternal war against shadowy foes (which, Curtis points out, don't exist in the hyperventilating form our governments present to justify their draconian flights of dark fancy).


    saddam-speaks-out-of-turn2.jpg


    When your dreams are supplanted by nightmares, is disintegration far behind?

    •  
      CommentAuthorDanieru
    • CommentTimeOct 11th 2006
     permalink
    One of Adam Curtis' other 'major' documentaries examines these issues, picking apart some of the foremost technologically-imagined, utopian-ideologies of the 20th century. 'Pandora's Box' is well worth a watch...

    ---

    I am about to head off to my 'Creative Non-Fiction and Journalism' seminar, in which I will expose my idea for a non-fiction book. The theme? The lack of an overarching myth in modern society. One of the main issuers of mythological rhetoric has to be the ever important George W. Bush. In 'his' black and white reality fear is something only the evil doers have produced.

    Emmanuel Todd's 'After the Empire' predicts the forthcoming breakdown of the American Order. Todd's clarity and appeal to authority should not be overlooked, he is said to have seen the passing of the USSR, and the reasons behind its fall, well over a decade before anyone else noticed the cracks showing.
  1.  permalink
    I think we have an overarching myth... it's a myth of progress, of a better era ahead. I read a good article about this paradigm switch...

    The New Meme:
    Throughout those millennia, nearly every civilization we know of had a belief system based upon what might be called a Look Backward world view. In other words, people shared a common belief that their tribe, people, nation once had a golden age, a better time when humans were more virtuous, stronger, closer to heaven. An era when sages worked wonders and were wiser than more recent folk. From Sumeria to China, to the legends of Native Americans, this thread of lost glory runs through almost every mythic tradition.

    Except ours. Our worldwide, cosmopolitan, modern culture is arguably the first to take a radically divergent orientation, not necessarily better, but profoundly different. A philosophy that might be called Look Forward.
    •  
      CommentAuthoridoru345
    • CommentTimeOct 12th 2006 edited
     permalink
    Since the mid 20th century, one of the principal ways the "look forward" myth has been spread and reinforced is via popular science fiction; "Star Trek" is an obvious, and globally recognized, example.

    I'm arguing that "look forward" is dying a slow death by strangulation at the hands of fear-besotted fundamentalisms (and I make little distinction between the neo-con and Jihadi varieties).

    Charles Stross, in a post titled Genre Neuroses 101 recently wrote about the moribund state of contemporary science fiction, at least the mass market stuff, with its fixation on futurized militarism.

    If science fiction no longer looks forward, except by fancifully improving upon the kill capacity of modern weapons and placing aircraft carriers in space, this suggests the "look forward" myth has fallen upon hard times.
    •  
      CommentAuthorDanieru
    • CommentTimeOct 12th 2006 edited
     permalink
    I tend to think that mythology is in the process of being transformed.

    Take Al Qaeda for instance. Their existence is ideological (find me the central hub) yet their image is of such grand enormity that it threatens, in its own immutable way, the very foundations of modern civilisation.

    Yet here is where the transformation occurs. How was this new threat proliferated? With modern mass communication systems, most obviously the internet. Our 'look forward' technology has been highjacked for the mutation of extreme conservatism: myth stays with the ancients.

    Hollywood has for 50 years or so been the hub of Western myth, weaving a dream of America into the very fibres of our world. This myth is at stake now in a very real way because of the same network Al Qaeda so cherish: the internet. The glitz and glamour, symbolism and simulacra of cinema is nothing if it has no bedrock, and digital media has been tending towards the destruction of this bedrock for the past decade.

    Perhaps it is time we stop mythologising our nationalities and move identity into the freeform realms of cyberspace. I like to think that Wikipedia is a good template for this process. Knowledge, and not merely information, is a mutual and malleable resource in its confines. All can craft the language of mediation between:

    Actual Events (Object), 'History' (Representamen) and The Process of Retrospection (Interpretant)

    Thus 'history', and with it 'future', is back in the hands of the tribe and not the tribe leaders.

    To save our ideologies we need to start perpetuating our own myth, in much the same way that Al Qaeda have done with theirs. I think part of this has already been occuring in the political rhetoric of our post 9/11 world. Bush's "Good vs Evil" and Tony Blair's insistence on talking about present events as though they have already been written into the history books. Their myth is there to procur votes and satiate their hunger for noteriety. Perhaps we all ought to let our appetities grow.
    • CommentAuthorwhat?
    • CommentTimeOct 12th 2006
     permalink
    The conflict is in the Noosphere...a wonderful word coined by Tielhard de Chardin to represent the world of Nous, of which cyberspace, books, comics TV, movies are all part. History is tracing it's path through phase space toward the great attractor, the final state.
    Does the tribe have leaders? Are those buffoons our leaders? I like to think our leaders are invisible, accidental creatures, whose actions set off cascading effect streams that shape our world without us even noticing.
    I also think bin Laden & co. are as incompetent as Bush & co. I don't know how they manage to sit down, not knowing where their arses are.

    Do we design this new myth, or do we find it?
    •  
      CommentAuthorDanieru
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2006
     permalink
    Mythology via mass communiction?
    Disaffected people living in the United States may develop radical ideologies and potentially violent skills over the internet and that could present the next major U.S. security threat, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said on Monday.
    "We now have a capability of someone to radicalize themselves over the internet," Chertoff said on the sidelines of a meeting of International Association of the Chiefs of Police. "They can train themselves over the internet. They never have to necessarily go to the training camp or speak with anybody else and that diffusion of a combination of hatred and technical skills in things like bomb-making is a dangerous combination," Chertoff said. "Those are the kind of terrorists that we may not be able to detect with spies and satellites."

    Chertoff pointed to the July 7, 2005 attacks on London's transit system, which killed 56 people, as an example a home-grown threat. To help gather intelligence on possible home-grown attackers, Chertoff said Homeland Security would deploy 20 field agents this fiscal year into "intelligence fusion centers," where they would work with local police agencies. - link
    The internet homogenises all knowledge.

    (via BoingBoing)
Add your comments
    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
Preview