Welcome, Guest

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

1. • CommentAuthorAkira Bergman
   • CommentTimeOct 9th 2007 edited

    permalink
   The universe starts from a fuzzy state;
   
   0. {universe}
   
   and it remains essentially fuzzy while building structures. Then it polarises into a mediated duality;
   
   1. {sense,{field}}
   
   The transition {} --> {,{}} has two implied directions of evolution;
   
   {,{}} = [,[]] + [,[]]*[[],] + [[],]
   
   Where the format is loosely stated, but it is somewhat like the Clifford algebra. It is undecidable whether 'sense' leads to 'field' or vice-versa. Like the chicken-egg dilemma. The fuzzy parent state transforms to [,[]]*[[],], and becomes the mediator of the duality. Like a tossed coin settling on it's rim, or having sexually fuzzy offspring.
   
   The mediated duality form is observable in many areas;
   
   . {mathematics} --> {operator,{number}}
   . {quantum mechanics} --> {observer,{observed}}
   . {music} --> {listener,{performer}}
   
   Then, iterate again to get offspring functionality;
   
   1. {sense,{field}}
   2. {exclusive,{inclusive}, {space-time-gravity*-light, {weak-strong}} }
   
   Where 'exclusive' stands for 'observe-move' or soft interaction, and 'inclusive' for 'reproduce-feed' or hard interaction. '*' stands for the field-antifield pair.
   
   The combination 'space-time-gravity*-light' is non-intrusive or soft interaction, while 'weak-strong' is hard.
   
   In mathematics;
   
   1. {operator,{number}}
   2. {additive,{multiplicative}, {0,{1}} }
   
   'additive' is not intrusive like 'observe-move', yet 'multiplicative' is intrusive like 'feed-reproduce'. '0' and '1' are are the identity elements of the operators.
   
   Therefore, 'field' seems to correspond to 'higgs'. The scalar field and it's associated operators are at the foundation of all systems. Like numbers for mathematics, money for economy.
   
   Then, iterate until 6;
   
   2-0. {exclusive,{inclusive}}
   3-0. {observe,{move}, {reproduce,{feed}} }
   
   2-1. {space-time-gravity*-light, {weak-strong}}
   3-1. {space-time,{gravity*-light}, {weak,{strong}} }
   
   ;;;
   
   3-0-0. {observe,{move}}
   4-0. {analyse-hear,{imagine-see}, {sustain-propel,{navigate-manipulate}} }
   
   3-0-1. {reproduce,{feed}}
   4-1. {non-sexual,{sexual}, {taste*,{smell*}} }
   
   ,,,
   
   3-1-0. {space-time,{gravity*-light}}
   4-2. {space,{time}, {gravity*,{light}} }
   
   3-1-1. {weak,{strong}}
   4-3. {neutral-weak,{charged-weak}, {strong,{residual-strong}} }
   
   The symmetry of 'weak' seems to be the symmetry of reproduction. Taste-strong correspondence is reasonable. Residual-strong refers to the force between nucleons.
   
   ;;;
   
   4-0-0. {analyse-hear,{imagine-see}}
   5-0. {analyse,{hear}, {imagine,{see}} }
   
   4-0-1. {maintain-propel,{navigate-manipulate}}
   5-1. {maintain,{propel}, {navigate,{manipulate}} }
   
   ,,,
   
   4-1-0. {non-sexual,{sexual}}
   5-2. {self-repr,{shared-repr}, {female,{male}} }
   
   4-1-1. {taste*,{smell*}}
   5-3. {taste,{untaste}, {smell,{unsmell}} }
   
   ...
   
   4-2-0. {space,{time}}
   5-4. {along-space,{lateral-space}, {along-time,{lateral-time}} }
   
   4-2-1. {gravity*,{light}}
   5-5. {gravity,{antigravity}, {electric,{magnetic}} }
   
   ,,,
   
   4-3-0. {neutral-weak,{charged-weak}}
   5-6. {organism-cell,{dna-molecule}, {star-planet,{moon-comet}} }
   
   ===> There seems to be a problem here with 'neutral-weak' to life mapping. Star-weak mapping seems to be OK. Still thinking about this.
   
   4-3-1. {strong,{residual-strong}}
   5-7. {black-hole/galaxy,{neutron-star/white-dwarf}, {hadron-lepton,{neutron-proton}} }
   
   Male/female and star-planet/moon-comet correspondence rings a mythological bell.
   
   ;;;
   
   5-0-0. {analyze,{hear}}
   6-0. {specialize,{generalize}, {left-hear,{right-hear}} }
   
   Analyzing is dual and performed by the two halves of the brain. While one side concentrates on detail, the other side concentrates on the context. This gives a clue to how we hear as well. The {bass,{treble}} duality of music corresponds to this.
   
   5-0-1. {imagine,{see}}
   6-1. {plan,{aim}, {left-see,{right-see}} }
   
   Imagining is also dual, but lateral to analyzing and in the forward-backward direction. The frontal cortex does the long term planning ('aim' above). This gives a clue to how we see as well.
   
   ,,,
   
   5-1-0. {maintain,{propel}}
   6-2. {sustain,{break}, {propel-forward,{propel-backward}} }
   
   Breaking is a part of maintaining, like sustaining.
   
   5-1-1. {navigate,{manipulate}}
   6-3. {left-turn,{right-turn},{make,{unmake}}
   
   Navigation seems to be more than just left and right turn, but in general this is the case. Cars have just a steering wheel for navigation.
   
   Manipulation is essentially an upmarket type of navigation involving choices along the way.
   
   ,,,
   
   5-2-0. {self-repr,{shared-repr}}
   6-4. {undifferentiated,{hermaphrodite}, {host,{guest}} }
   
   5-2-1. {female,{male}}
   6-5. {feminine-female,{masculine-female}, {masculine-male,{feminine-male}} }
   
   ,,,
   
   5-3-0. {taste,{untaste}}
   6-6. {eat,{drink}, {defecate,{urinate}} }
   
   At the 6th step, sense becomes organ related.
   
   5-3-1. {smell,{unsmell}}
   6-7. {breathe-in,{breathe-out},{impregnated,{impregnate}}
   
   Nose and sexual organs are closely related.
   
   ---
   
   5-4-0. {along-space,{lateral-space}}
   6-8. {forward,{backward}, {left,{right}} }
   
   Space is essentially one complex dimension. Complex numbers are closed, and they have one along and one lateral dimension; {1,i}. There is only one space dimension between two objects. The surface of the earth can be viewed as a complex plane. There seems to be 3 perfect dimensions of space, but this is never the case, since there is always gravity distortion. Space can not exist without gravity. I think the apparent threeness of space is related to it's content; matter.
   
   5-4-1. {along-time,{lateral-time}}
   6-9. {forward,{backward}, {left,{right}} }
   
   This point is also surprising for me, like the previous one on space, although it is well known that time is complex. Time travel is predicted here.
   
   ,,,
   
   5-5-0. {gravity,{antigravity}}
   6-10. {+gravity,{-gravity}, {+antigravity,{-antigravity}} }
   
   Gravity is a polarised field like electric field. Anti-gravity is predicted here and it maps to magnetic field below, to give a clue about it's character. It seems anti-gravity can be produced by electric currents.
   
   5-5-1. {electric,{magnetic}}
   6-11. {+electric,{-electric}, {+magnetic,{-magnetic}} }
   
   The poles of magnetic field do not exist separately, but electric field's do.
   
   ,,,
   
   5-6-0. {organism-cell,{dna-molecule}}
   6-12. {organism,{cell}, {dna,{molecule}} }
   
   ===> There seems to be a problem here with 'neutral-weak' to life mapping. Star-weak mapping seems to be OK. Still thinking about this.
   
   5-6-1. {star-planet,{moon-comet}}
   6-13. {star,{planet}, {moon,{comet}} }
   
   5-7-0. {hadron-lepton,{neutron-proton}}
   6-14. {hadron,{lepton}, {neutron,{proton}} }
   
   5-7-1. {black-hole/galaxy,{neutron-star/white-dwarf}}
   6-15. {black-hole,{galaxy}, {neutron-star,{white-dwarf}} }
   
   ***
   
   Senses and fields expand into two parallel binary trees complementing each other. The numbers involved correlate strongly with mythology.
   
   (6,5,4,3,2,1,0,1,2,3,4,5,6)
   
   They add up to 2*(1+2+3+4+5+6) = 42 (The answer maybe 42 after all!). The tree expands into 64 distinct categories at the outer edge. Reminding I-Ching and the Jewish mythology about creation. Many more interesting numbers can be extracted from the tree, depending on how it is looked at.
   
   Complex numbers, modular group and Mobius transformation are closely related.
   
   A link to computers is also made. Electronic computing is based on binary trees. The universe seems to be a boolean computer at the overall category calculation level.
   
   AB
   http://a-theory-of-nothingness.blogspot.com/
2. •  
     CommentAuthoralexanderj
   • CommentTimeNov 14th 2007

    permalink
   Sorry Mr. Akira, I dont believe that this is a working Theory of Everything. I'm not sure I even find it novel. Its more Time Cube-like and crude than Kabbalistic metaphysics.
   
   

   
   5-3-0. {taste,{untaste}}
   6-6. {eat,{drink}, {defecate,{urinate}} }
   
   At the 6th step, sense becomes organ related.
   
   5-3-1. {smell,{unsmell}}
   6-7. {breathe-in,{breathe-out},{impregnated,{impregnate}}
   
   Nose and sexual organs are closely related.

   
   
   Phoric! Senseless!
   
   
   

   5-4-1. {along-time,{lateral-time}}
   6-9. {forward,{backward}, {left,{right}} }
   
   This point is also surprising for me, like the previous one on space, although it is well known that time is complex. Time travel is predicted here.

   
   
   Even more phoric! Jumping conclusions! How can you justify this? Where is the material that supports hastened religiousity?
3. • CommentAuthorAkira Bergman
   • CommentTimeNov 15th 2007

    permalink
   There is no Kabbalism or religiosity here, apart from the last references to mythology. The method is purely comparative and sorting. I know that there may be few problems with it, as I already noted some. The parts that work, work well since the method is comparative.
   
   Your reply is illogical, empty and emotional.
4. •  
     CommentAuthoralexanderj
   • CommentTimeNov 16th 2007

    permalink
   No, really not that illogical. Its a response to the forced simplified ideeas that you apparently are trying to tie into equations. Grossly simplified. Reality is more complex than that, and you ought to know so. Its not just ying-yang linear mathematics that are comparable on a level like that, when forced simplified!
   
   

   4-1-0. {non-sexual,{sexual}}
   5-2. {self-repr,{shared-repr}, {female,{male}} }

   
   
   (Whaat?!)
5. • CommentAuthorAkira Bergman
   • CommentTimeNov 16th 2007 edited

    permalink
   Of course it is simplified. It is a category tree. I had no claims of it being anything other than that. It is just a category tree designed to reveal the parallels between life and universe. You are putting labels on it like TOE, equations, Kabbal, religion. I dislike totalitarian religions as much as most sensible people, specially when it organizes the ignorant fools to serve the elite. But there are many interesting and mysterious aspects of the ancient cultures that are not explained. Many of those aspects have arrived our time after suffering much distortion. For example the Christian cross and David's star are originally from Asia.
   
   That example about reproduction simply says that reproduction is of two types; non-sexual and sexual. Non-sexual also splits into two. Ask properly and kindly if you don't understand, instead of trying to discredit me. Maybe you want to tone down down your arrogant style, since it does not serve your level of knowledge well, if it serves any level anyway. I do not like pissing contests. If you do not behave yourself, I will not respond again.